WebDec 16, 2024 · It must be by human agency only. – Gajanan Moreshwar v, Moreshwar Madan §124 does not deal with indemnity between principal and agent. Persons can only encash indemnity to meet losses suffered. Anything more would be undeserved windfall doe one and penalty for other. – Cargill Intl. v. Bangladesh Sugar & Food Ind. Corp. WebJan 15, 2012 · Gajanan Moreshwar v. Moreshwar Madan (1942) 44 BOMLR 703 (Section 124 of Indian Contract Act, when indemnity can be claimed) FACTS: Plaintiff (P) got a plot of land on lease from municipal corp. of Mumbai. P allowed Defendant (D) to erect building on that land. D, in this course, incurred debt of Rs.5ooo from building…
Gajanan Moreshwar Parelkar v t2 1 .docx - Gajanan...
WebJan 29, 2013 · Gajanan Moreshwar v. Moreshwar Madan (1942) 44 BOMLR 703 (Section 124 of Indian Contract Act, when indemnity can be claimed) FACTS: Plaintiff (P) got a plot of land on lease from municipal corp. of Mumbai. P allowed Defendant (D) to erect building on that land. D, in this course, incurred debt of Rs.5ooo from building… WebSep 17, 2024 · In an indemnity claim, a party (" Indemnifier ") promises to protect another party (" Indemnity Holder ") to the contract from any loss, expense, cost, damage or any other legal consequences caused due to an act or omission by the conduct of the Indemnifier or any third party or an event. drawing leaf shapes
Gajanan Moreshwar v. Moreshwar Madan – Indian Case Law
WebJun 24, 2024 · Secretary of State v. Bank of India (1938) Facts of the case Judgement of the Court Gajanan Moreshwar Parelkar v. Moreshwar Madan Mantri (1942) Facts of the case Judgement of the Court Mohit Kumar Saha v. New India Assurance Co. (1996) Facts of the case Judgement of the Court Lala Shanti Swarup v. Munshi Singh (1967) Facts of the case Web1. This is a suit by the plaintiff to enforce an indemnity. It seems that in the year 1934 the plaintiff entered into an agreement with the Municipal Corporation for the City … employing pathos